Rambler's Top100

in English

Dashnaks Slam U.S. Praise Of Armenian Ruling On Turkey

Armenia -- An Armenian Revolutionary Federation flag flying against the backdrop of the Constitutional Court building in Yerevan on January 12 2010..

25.01.2010

The opposition Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun) denounced on Monday the U.S. State Department for welcoming an Armenian Constitutional Court ruling on Turkey that has sparked a diplomatic dispute between Yerevan and Ankara.



Dashnaktsutyun leaders claimed that by effectively siding with Armenia in the row, the United States is pressurizing its leadership to unconditionally implement the controversial Turkish-Armenian agreements which their party considers a sellout to Turkey.

While upholding the constitutionality of the two “protocols,” the Constitutional Court ruled on January 12 that they place no obligations on Armenia with regard to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and can not inhibit its pursuit of greater international recognition of the Armenian genocide.

Dashnaktsutyun welcomed this interpretation of the U.S.-backed protocols, saying that the Armenian parliament should ratify them with corresponding “reservations.” Its top representatives said in particular that the court effectively invalidated a protocol clause that commits Armenia to explicitly recognizing the existing border with Turkey.

The Turkish government has likewise claimed that the ruling runs counter to the letter and spirit of the deal and jeopardizes its implementation by Turkey. Armenia’s leadership has brushed aside these claims, accusing Ankara of seeking “artificial pretexts” for delaying its parliamentary ratification.

U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Philip Gordon told RFE/RL on Friday that Washington regards the judgment as a “positive step forward in the ratification process of the normalization protocols” that “does not appear to limit or qualify them in any way.” Armenian pro-government politicians and media were quick to welcome the U.S. reaction as a crucial endorsement of Yerevan’s position in the dispute. Dashnaktsutyun strongly disagree with that.

“It was a statement made a bit prematurely, and I don’t think that it is only aimed at somehow benefiting Armenia,” Artsvik Minasian, a senior Dashnaktsutyun member, told RFE/RL, commenting on Gordon’s remarks. “What is more, I think that was a form of pressure on Armenia aimed at making sure that we don’t ratify the protocols with reservations,” he said.

Giro Manoyan, the party’s chief foreign policy spokesman, also accused Washington of pressurizing Yerevan. “When a representative of a foreign state tries to teach us some lessons I don’t think that is acceptable,” he told RFE/RL.

According to Minasian, Dashnaktsutyun has drafted legal amendments that would empower Armenia’s parliament to ratify international treaties and agreements signed by the executive branch with conditions or reservations. He said they will be presented this week to 13 other mostly small opposition groups aligned in a Dashnaktsutyun-led coalition staunchly opposed to the protocols.

Leaders of those parties met at the Dashnaktsutyun headquarters in Yerevan over the weekend to discuss their further actions. One of them, Armen Martirosian of the Zharangutyun party, was skeptical about the Dashnaktsutyun bill. Martirosian predicted on Monday that the parliament majority loyal to President Serzh Sarkisian will unconditionally endorse the protocols should they be put to the vote.

A deputy chairman of Sarkisian’s Republican Party of Armenia, which has a clear majority in the National Assembly, confirmed that. “If we add reservations to the protocols, the Turks will never ratify them,” Razmik Zohrabian told RFE/RL. “We should therefore avoid any reservations.”

Zohrabian also hailed the U.S. reaction to the Armenian court ruling, saying that it shows just how “vulnerable and superficial” the Turkish diplomacy can be.
 
Ֆորումը փակված է:
Comment Sorting
     
Comments
by: Gevorg ում կողմից: Yerevan
26.01.2010 20:40
Giro, would you be happy if Gordon agreed with what the Turks have said about the court's decision?

I don't care who commented on the court's decision first, you or the Turks. The bottom line is that Dashnaktsutun and the Turkish government have very similar views here. It is obvious that the Turks are exploiting the decision to share with Armenia the international blame for the collapse of the agreements.

Even assuming that the protocols are bad, Armenia can not afford to been seen even partly responsible for their non-ratification. This is what will happen if we ratify them with reservations or conditions, and I'm sure your party understands that, which makes its position all the more irresponsible.

by: Giro Manoyan ում կողմից: Yerevan, Armenia
26.01.2010 16:25
Gevorg, the sentence you use in your comment to prove that U.S. State State Department's position is favorable to the Armenian Constitutional Court's Decision is the sugarcoating used to cover the main point the U.S. State Department wants to make, which you choose to disregard and which says: " “The court decision permits the protocols, as they were negotiated and signed, to move forward towards parliamentary ratification, and does not appear to limit or qualify them in any way.”

You also choose to disregard, just as the U.S. State Department and the Serzh Sargsyan administration in Armenia have chosen to disregard, the relevant point in the Armenian Constitutional Court's Decision which I've coated in my previous comment: "The Constitutional Court finds
necessary that the steps by the Republic of Armenia towards
undertaking the contemplated obligations and towards ensuring
legislative and institutional safeguards necessary for the fulfillment
of such obligations be consistent with the legal positions set fort in
this Decision and the fundamental principles of the constitutional
order stipulated by the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia."

Finally, the ARF-Dashnaktsutyun party published its position on the Armenian Constitutional Court's Decision on the same day the Court published its Decision, whereas the Turkish Foreign Ministry published its position 5-6 days later. The U.S. State Department published its position only after the Turkish Foreign Minister had a phone conversation with the U.S. Secretary of State, who consequently has called the Armenian Foreign Minister.


by: Gevorg ում կողմից: Yerevan
26.01.2010 15:33
"We view the court decision as a POSITIVE STEP FORWARD in the ratification process of the normalization protocols between Turkey and Armenia."

The Americans just couldn't be more explicit in welcoming the court verdict and rejecting its interprepation by the Turkish government's AND the Dashnak party. Like it or not, the US does support Armenia in this controversy.

by: Giro Manoyan ում կողմից: Yerevan, Armenia
26.01.2010 14:40
RFE/RL's is misleading its readers when it claims that "the U.S. State
Department [is] welcoming an Armenian Constitutional Court ruling on
Turkey that has sparked a diplomatic dispute between Yerevan and
Ankara. Dashnaktsutyun leaders claimed that by effectively siding with
Armenia in the row, the United States is pressurizing its leadership
to unconditionally implement the controversial Turkish-Armenian
agreements which their party considers a sellout to Turkey."

The U.S. State Department has not really "welcomed" the Armenian
Constitutional Court's decision, nor has it "effectively sided" with
the Court's decision, because it has claimed that: “The court decision
permits the protocols, as they were negotiated and signed, to move
forward towards parliamentary ratification, and does not appear to
limit or qualify them in any way.”

This claim is a complete disregard to what the Constitutional Court
says in point 6 of its decision: "The Constitutional Court finds
necessary that the steps by the Republic of Armenia towards
undertaking the contemplated obligations and towards ensuring
legislative and institutional safeguards necessary for the fulfillment
of such obligations be consistent with the legal positions set fort in
this Decision and the fundamental principles of the constitutional
order stipulated by the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia." The
first instance to ensure "legislative and institutional safeguards" is
the ratification of the protocols by the Armenian legislature with
reservations "consistent with the legal positions set forth in [the
Constitutional Court's] Decision."

A U.S. statement claiming "“The court decision permits the protocols,
as they were negotiated and signed, to move forward towards
parliamentary ratification, and does not appear to limit or qualify
them in any way,” is a flagrant disregard towards the Armenian
Constitutional Court's decision and an unacceptable interference in
Armenia's internal affairs.

The possibility that the U.S. Administration's position is shared by
the Armenian authorities, does not make it "effectively siding with
Armenia," because the Armenian Constitutional Court is also Armenia.
And that's why this U.S. statement is an unacceptable interference in
Armenia's internal affairs, namely a disagreement so far between the
Executive and the Constitutional Court.
     
Տեքստի չափը - +

Կայքէջի ծառայություններ.

PodcastRSS